Grey Hat SEO
Grey hat SEO refers to tactics that sit between approved, guideline-friendly methods and clear spam. They are either not explicitly banned or banned but loosely enforced, and they carry more risk than white hat work. What counts as grey hat shifts over time as Google updates its policies.
Where grey hat sits
SEO tactics are often described using three hat colours, borrowed from old western films where heroes wore white hats and villains wore black:
- White hat SEO: methods that follow Google’s guidelines, such as creating useful content and fixing technical problems.
- Black hat SEO: deliberate manipulation that breaks the rules, such as cloaking or hacking sites to plant links.
- Grey hat SEO: everything in between, where the aim is to influence rankings and the rules are ambiguous or loosely enforced.
The labels are community shorthand, not official Google terms. Google itself only distinguishes between what complies with its spam policies and what does not.
Examples of grey hat tactics
- Buying expired domains and redirecting them to pass on their backlinks. Using old domains to manipulate rankings can fall under expired domain abuse.
- Guest posting at scale mainly to get links with keyword-rich anchor text, rather than to reach a new audience.
- Link exchanges between sites that agree to link to each other. Google names excessive reciprocal links as a form of link spam.
- Spinning or AI rewriting of existing articles without adding anything new.
- Aggressive exact-match anchor text in internal and external links.
- Gifting products for reviews that include links without proper disclosure or link attributes.
Why grey hat is risky
Many tactics that were once grey are now clearly against the rules. Google’s policies have grown to cover link schemes, thin affiliate pages and more. In March 2024 Google added three new policies: scaled content abuse, site reputation abuse and expired domain abuse.
Sites relying on grey hat tactics can lose rankings through algorithm updates, or receive manual actions from Google’s reviewers. Even when nothing happens for years, the tactic can stop working overnight when Google improves its detection.
The risk is commercial as well as technical. Rankings built on shaky foundations can vanish quickly, taking traffic and revenue with them, and recovery often takes months.
How to judge a tactic
- Ask whether you would be comfortable explaining it to a Google employee or a competitor. This test comes from Google’s own long-standing guidance.
- Ask whether you would still do it if search engines did not exist. Google has used this question for years too.
- Check the tactic against Google’s current spam policies, not old blog posts or forum threads.
- Consider the downside: what would happen to the business if this tactic were penalised tomorrow?
- Weigh the effort against white hat alternatives that build value you keep.
A practical view
Few businesses can afford to lose their main source of leads. For most, the safest approach is to treat grey areas cautiously, keep records of any link building or content partnerships, and invest mainly in tactics that would survive a stricter Google.
Key Takeaways
- Grey hat SEO covers tactics between approved methods and clear spam.
- The hat labels are community terms, not Google categories.
- Many former grey hat tactics are now named in Google’s spam policies.
- Grey hat tactics risk algorithmic demotion or manual actions.
- A good test is whether the tactic would make sense without search engines.
Related Terms
Wondering what to fix first on your site? Get a free check of your site’s SEO, or keep learning in the SEO Encyclopedia.